Regional Centers Denying services

Seems like everything I say, write and think about lately starts with "in the current economic climate..." but the truth is little has changed for my kid at school or in the regional center. For five years, Regional Center has denied Augmentative Communication services and devices for my child at home. This year, they may provide them. It seems like they should have all along, under the Lanterman Act. That is also what Protection and Advocacy described in a Q&A for families. 

A friend and local advocate shared this thought with me:

"Now more than ever the process involves getting the denial in writing and then appealing it.  Every family is being asked to take a cut in services and only those that appeal are even getting consideration.  It's wrong, very wrong, but that is how the RC is operating currently.  Complaints to the Client's Rights Advocate at Disability Rights California (formerly PAI), should be copied to the case manager, the supervisor of the unit, and, in Concord, Ella Liggins, the Associate Director of Consumer Services.  In the main office in Oakland,  Pam Thomas is the Director of Consumer Services, and the Executive Director of RCEB is Jim Burton.  I recognize that it is a few extra copies to send but until the RC gets the message that parents are not going to stand for unreasonable cuts, it may be necessary.  Another critical part of this process is to be certain that all services are written in the IPP.  While this sounds like a given, many parents have discussed services with the case manager and they have never been transferred to the IPP. It sounds simple but it is not always done."

A Modest Solution

Our board members will be forced into the untenable, miserable position of having to make additional cuts to the MDUSD budget. I do not envy their position, nor the pressure they will feel from panicked parents who see our infrastructure crumble in front of our eyes. As a parent of three children, one with disabilities, I feel this pull and tug daily. Yet the child I represent at board meetings, state budget meetings and in the community is my child with a disability. If you have a child with a disability, you know why. The threat that all children face now is not new to us. Our kids cost more. That is reason enough for resentment. 

Here are some objections and refuting talking points I am keeping in mind as I work with the board, neighbors, friends and legislators to advocate for our students and help others 'walk a mile in our kids walkers.'

The first and most important point is this. We are a community. Either we serve students with disabilities or we hang a sign at the district border that says "We don't serve your kind here." If we do decide to do the right thing, the civilized and ethical thing, then we should do it with as much pride as we do, say, football, band, robotics, and Honors courses. Right now we are uncommitted. We have parents irate that students might have to pay a fee to play extracurricular sports. At the same time, some of our students have to sit on the sidelines at recess because they cannot get to the play structures. We have a district that has spent tens of thousands of dollars in court, losing the argument that playgrounds don't have to be accessible to all students.Where are the indignant parents speaking for the disabled? Arguing that special education costs too much, not crying that those kids can't play. What does the board say? Nothing in defense of our kids, no apology for the playground structures, no shame at the fiscal waste. 

1. Misconception: We need to cut spending. The governor and Republican minority claim we can cut spending and get out of the budget crisis. This is a revenue problem, not a spending problem. A majority of voters locally and throughout the state support tax increases. School districts have cut to the bone. The state needs to raise more money for the services we, proudly and rightly provide our citizens. We used to be an educational leader, now our per student spending matches our test scores: lowest in the country. If we want a first class educational system, we need to spend at least as much as New York. That would require doubling our per pupil spending and place us roughly in the top third of states.  Until then, we get what we pay for. 
   
2. Misconception: Special education is too expensive! Parents of regular education students have noticed that special education takes up 23% of the total budget. At about 11% of the total population, that means our kids with special needs are roughly twice as expensive as regular ed kids. Actually, 2:1 expenses is a really good ratio. While we have some students who require minimal services, I know that many children are more severe. Mine for instance has an aide, a nurse, and occupational therapist, speech therapist, assitive technology specialist, physical therapist, computer and a class of eight. Her education is more than 10 times what her sister costs the district. We have managed to keep our program costs reasonably low and our services for special education students are something we should be as proud of as our sports and Advanced Placement services. 
   
3. Partial truth: There is a lot of fraud, waste and abuse in special education! The district should be forthcoming about waste and abuse. It has spent significant sums of money in court fighting  students' rights. The money now allocated to resurface playgrounds is an example. Had those been properly installed, or had the district remedied the improper installation at the request of the Spieler class rather than going to court to appeal, that money wasted would now be available to hire teachers. The district should be as compliant with law as possible; it is the right, and least expensive thing to do.

Systematic abuse, not excessive service for disabled students, is the norm. Remember the nineties and early 2000's? Gosh, life was good! Unemployment was low, housing prices were rising fast, the governor still had seven Hummers. That was the economic context under which the consent decree in our district came into being. When money was flowing and business was booming, the district was forced to admit systematically violating the rights of students with disabilities. They agreed under a consent decree monitored by the federal court to set aside 20 million dollars over ten years-- a scant 2 million a year-- to remedy their ways. During the consent decree they managed to waste additional money fighting students with disabilities, wasting staggering sums of money and then having to do what the law required anyway. Now that times are bad, they say they cannot afford to special education. What's new? The Nazi's used this same propaganda to incite support of forced sterilization and euthanasia of the disabled. No one ever wants to spend money on children with disabilities. That is why we have IDEA and ADA. Otherwise, we might eat our young when we got hungry enough. 

"The generosity of the voters"

Yesterday I went to Sacramento to speak to the legislative budget committee on what the committee chair sarcastically called "the governor's revised revision of the May revise" of the budget. 

The room was packed, standing room only, and the line went out the hall. During the public comment period, which lasted well over an hour, I joined citizen after citizen in appeals to our legislators. Each of us begging them not to cut education in our state further, describing the crippling blows our local schools and services have taken. No one spoke in favor of smaller government, less taxes or more cuts to education or health and human services. Yet the majority sat powerless to act, because of the tyranny of a few ideologues who have sworn a blood oath with their party to raise no new revenue, no matter what. 

In California, it takes a two thirds vote to levy any new tax. In spite of a 59% vote in favor of new taxes in our district, we cannot raise money to stem the hemorage created by the violent slashing of the state budget. People are literally jobless, homeless and hungry,  yet they sit smug and satisfied to do more harm.

One Republican member asked about the fraud, waste and abuse in In Home Supportive Services for the disabled that were, in his words "taking advantage of the generosity of the taxpayers." To him, I say this:

•  These services are so hard to get, I can't imagine fraud waste and abuse in the system. If there is, you risk killing the patient trying to excise the last of the cancer. Seriously, how much more can you spend trying to prevent unnecessary expenditures? 
  
• Second, charity and generosity are neither if they are given with resentment and used to shame the recipient. Generosity and charity exalt the giver and the receiver. That which you do unto the least of these...
  
• Third, and most importantly, programs for the disabled are not built by generosity, they are built by wisdom. You are likely to need these one day. 

As one great legislator once said, you will never be black, you will never be a woman, but you may easily become disabled on your way home. 

Many people have told me that my daughter was born so that I could learn-- if there is a force out there that guides the life experiences we have in order that we may learn compassion, humility, and generosity first hand, may that force bring those lessons to the Republican party of California. And may no one else need suffer while they are learning. 

Funding Disabilities

I am in New York on business. Miss my kids. 

And wow, am I tired of writing about Assistive Technology. If I had a magic wand, I would make all that magically better and move on. But, respite is essential, and I am taking respite from the topic. 

I came across a lovely article in a local Brooklyn rag about funding challenges for a local organization serving people with developmental disabilities-- The Guild for Exceptional Children. This after a conversation with a very good friend about AT and the need to develop more developmentally appropriate software that interfaces with the My Tobii eyegaze system... to which he suggested with the sweetest intent: there must be foundations out there that would take that on. 

It seems particularly ironic with this article in the paper today. And parents of children with disabilities know it just ain't so. There is not much money in services for disabilities. Not much of a market for specialized products like the My Tobii or the ECO. More attorneys work for districts blocking children's IEPs than work for children to secure their rights. It is always, all about money. Why should your kid go without so that my kid, who clearly will not amount to anything, should get a really fancy computer that helps her add and read Clifford? THAT is friggin' socialism. BAD.... bad socialism. YAY survival of the fittest.  (Sorry, listening to Sean Hannity today in the cab at about 80 decibels bent me out of shape).

The thing is, it is easy, so easy for the right to say that every one has a right to life, but not so easy to say that everyone has a right to quality of life. Quality ain't cheap. Quality for everyone is socialism.

Here is my final, line in the sand, quid pro quo: I will concede to restrictions on abortion. Really, I will the instant, the very instant, that  medical care, food, shelter and water and care by highly-qualified providers are the legally protected rights of EVERY child who has taken their first breath in our great nation, including every child with a disability. 

Is that so much to ask? Just a little socialism, Sean. For the kids. 

The law is the law

The beauty of the rule of law is that it is here to remind us what to do when we really would like to forget. Like when you are driving down the highway and some lunatic cuts you off and nearly causes a wreck and you might want to retaliate, but you think about your insurance rates, and the moving violations.

Well, the current budget crisis is a wreck. And fortunately we have a few laws in place to remind us how to behave. When things are good, it is not so hard. I never feel road rage when there is no traffic, only when I am hemmed in. That is self interest at work. Laws are more important when the right thing is not the convenient thing. Even in good times, districts needed a law to remind them that special education students had a right to play on the playgrounds, and a right to be in school with appropriate supports. Now in bad times, they need a big reminder.

The law is the law. IDEA is a very strong law, written as a remedy during a time when students with disabilities were legally excluded from schools. It is a good law that reminds us to do the right thing, and it needs to be reinforced. The difficulty of the law is that sometimes things must go badly awry before a remedy can occur... one cannot press assault charges until the assault has already occurred.

Hopefully no students will be hurt as boards of educations are doing the impossible task of balancing budgets in the current crisis.

After all, the law is the law, whether you use it for hindsight or for foresight.

Happy Birthday Dr. King

The history of the United States of America could be told as the history of a nation that struggled toward the vision enshrined in its Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights. Slowly and inexorably, this nation has extended these rights to life, liberty to all it's citizens whether cream colored, brown or black, whether male or female, under 21 or 18 or over, whether ambulatory, seeing, disabled or not... eventually we even envision these right extended to all the world's people in our great movement to spread democracy. 

But this inclusive vision was not always so. And is under constant threat both overt and subtle. In the beginning, we are often told, only white males over 21 who owned property could vote. In some colonies, they also had to belong to the state church (told less frequently). 

When the states and the new federal government could not resolve certain differences (like who should be allowed to vote) the argument was settled by reserving these rights to the states. Thus, states were allowed to set the criteria for voting rights, and by extension all others, like property rights, rights to attend school. 

Thus was born the civil rights movement, for what could be more in conflict than the freedoms envisioned in the Declaration and the Bill of Rights and a state prohibition to attend school because a student is female, or has a darker complexion than his peers, or cannot walk? 

Most people do not realize that the history of disability rights goes back as far as the history of civil rights for women and African Americans. In fact, the years that Dr. King and Malcolm X were working for the full rights of African Americans, people with disabilities were doing some of the same work. And these years were preceded by centuries of work to slowly extend the freedoms we all cherish to people of every color, every creed, every ability, every gender (well, at least two genders and more in places)... to every one. 

Yet this is where the rubber meets the road, where the admonition sometimes attributed to Jefferson, "the price of liberty is eternal vigilance," becomes real. For intentions are not enough. 

IDEA needs to be fully funded to be real. Without funding it is de jure, and not de facto law. It cannot be real. We must hold our newest president, and ourselves, to his promise to fund IDEA and bring more of our citizens into full protection under the law, and full citizenship. For more on the history of disability rights, see:

www.sfsu.edu/~hrdpu/chron.htm

if the army had to hold a bakesale

I was thinking of a protest slogan from the Vietnam War era, "Wouldn't it be great if our schools had all the money they needed and the military had to hold a bakesale to buy a bomber?" when I attended the school board meeting this week. 

Special Education parents had rallied to discuss the many items on the list of budget reductions that included firing nurses, occupational therapists, speech therapists, classroom aides,  and others.  

The JROTC program was also on the reductions list-- to reduce the army officer teachers to two, and combine the 100 students into two classes. (That may sound like a lot of students per teacher, but most high school teachers-- math, English, science, history etc-- see over 120 students daily.) The JROTC staff had really helped the students to organize and prepare for the meeting, bringing in community members, family and students to speak very passionately in favor of the program.  They had speakers address the board for nearly an hour. 

Somehow in all of this, the special education parents who came to speak were shuffled to the end of the meeting and their time was cut from three minutes each to one minute each.  It seemed like an accidental oversight or mistake, but it really felt that we, that our children, mattered less. It did not help that Mr. Eberhardt, the board president, told every special ed speaker to "wrap it up." 

One of the JROTC staff said, "We are not here to recruit your children... this is a leadership program. We could have used the McDonald's model. But we used the Army model." Yes, but if the program did use the McDonald's model, the Army wouldn't  pay for it. Why? Uh, well, it is a recruitment program.  

Why is this a special education topic? 

The Army funds the JROTC at 50%. The federal government does not fund IDEA (the Individuals with Disabilities in Special Education Act) to even the mandated 40% level that Congress wrote into the law. 

For this posting I am putting aside all of my rants about the Army reducing its own IQ standard to increase recruiting for the current wars, the ACLUs public position that U.S. military recruiting practices among minors violates international laws,  and my convictions that Kurt Hahn and James Williams were right, there is a moral equivalent to war;  all my reasons for thinking the military does not belong in schools at all. 

For this post, my question is: given the sheer size of the military budget, and the drastic state of educational funding, should the army kick in the other fifty percent for JROTC? Why is our district paying for a military recruitment program at all? If the program is that valuable to to the army, then let them fund it. 

Or at least they could help the special education department hold a bake sale. They do a lot of community service, and what a great photo op for the army's new humanitarian image to have those handsome, uniformed cadets helping my daughter in her wheelchair as she tries to sell cupcakes outside the district office! 

I've noticed the army still has not had to hold their own bakesale. 

Is there a moral equivalent to war? It just might be funding IDEA, maybe even 50%. 

California's deep cuts to SpED

The governor that recalled a governor because the budget in California was not balanced cannot balance the budget. Things have become incredibly chaotic under the Governator than they ever were under Pete Wilson. 

Just last week, school districts, which compose their budgets for the 08-09 school year in June (six months ago), were told that they had to make additional cuts for this year. That means they have to figure out how to unspend money already spent. This after making deep cuts for the current year last spring. (Confused? That is because the whole process does not make sense-- does your paycheck get revised after it is in the bank?)

 

Who is in charge up there? Why are Californians not storming the capitol? 

 

What this means in the real world, not the land of magical thinking that Schwatzenager seems to occupy, is that classes are being combined mid-year, assistants, nurses, speech therapists are being fired mid-year and schools that somehow managed to hang onto music and athletics are losing them mid-year. One child said to the board: It seems like we just got music back, and now you are taking it away again! 

 

Last night, our board had to figure out how to make an additional 16 million dollars worth of cuts. Line by line, they went through the budget. News flash! Education is not a huge wasteful enterprise, not some pork barrel project. It is actually a pretty lean, efficient system. Well, lean. It would be more efficient with more money, actually.  So, line by line, the community looked for the corporate jet and the martini lunches, the tax sheltered golf games, the trips to conferences at exotic resorts. They just are not there. The corporate holiday party for teachers at my child's school was a box of fudge and a thank you card brought by parents and a pot luck lunch brought by teachers.  

So what they cut is jobs.

And how is laying off all of these people-- groundskeepers, custodians, carpenters, music teachers, coaches, occupational therapists, speech therapists, nurses, teachers' aides-- how exactly does that help our state economy? Now we have more people needing unemployment, in danger of losing their homes... how does that help? 

 

The mantra of the right that we have a spending problem is just getting to threadbare. The whole party wants to patch the holes in their seats. They don't seem to realize they are wearing the emperor's clothes and there is nothing to patch.

 

As a California home owner (there are still some left) our family pays less in property taxes than the state pays per year to educate two typically developing children. We have three kids, one with special needs. Those taxes need to also cover water systems, fire services, hiway patrol, 911. In short, we make a profit on our taxes and our state government. 

 

We do NOT have a spending problem. We have a revenue problem.  MORE NEW TAXES!

 

Congratulations to the right-- you have finally managed to cripple the finest public education system ever built.  The only system ever attempt to educate all it's citizens regardless of race, class, religious affiliation, gender or disability; to attempt to educate all citizens equally; to invest in social mobility and cultivate talent from every sector of society is now on it's knees, thanks to your strangle hold on funds and your anti-education agenda. Your loathing for this great equalizer has finally born fruit. The schools that can actually educate function only because they are supported by wealthy PTAs and private foundations, while the schools attended by poor and working class families are falling apart. Parents of typically developing children are calling for cuts to special education. One parent described what is happening to our district as "death by a thousand cuts." 

 

I suppose next spring you'll be complaining about test scores and blaming children, parents and teachers for those too. I blame you. I know how hard those teachers work, and how much time we spend on homework and at board meetings. Now you, the legislature, need to do your part. We need more teachers, smaller classes, more supplies and enough money to heat the buildings. Oh-- that stuff is not free. 

Shame, shame, shame on us for letting the legislature get away with this. Let's take the week off, hop on those district funded jets, go up to the capitol and demand a rescue package for our school system. And afterwards, we can go out for cocktails and plan our next golf vacation...

For more on this issue, see the article in the SF Chronicle: 

http://sfgate.com/cgi?file=/c/a/2009/01/14/MNS4159KA4.DTL

IDEA- fund special ed!

The Right says we have a spending problem.  I agree. 

The problem is that the federal government is NOT spending it's legal share of funds on the IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act). 

IDEA is the law that requires schools to provide a free and appropriate education to students with disabilities. Appropriate, in lay terms, means a kid not only gets to go to school, but they get to go and learn. 

Why do we have this law? In 1970, according to the IDEA website, only one in five children with disabilities were in school. Many states had laws barring children with disabilities from attending public schools, including children who were deaf, blind, emotionally disturbed and mentally retarded. It was simply expensive and states did not want to do it. 

They still don't. California has been shirking it's duty for years by funding the Cost of Living Adjustment for regular education teachers but not special education teachers. California does this because the federal government does not fully fund IDEA, and California does not want to make up the funding difference. 

That is why local districts pay so much for special education. IDEA requires every state to provide a free education to every child, even children with disabilities. 

The feds knew in passing IDEA that they would be adding enormous expenses to schooling. At the time, it was as radical a step as Brown V. Board of Education, desegregating schools, and a lot more expensive. It meant that kids in diapers, kids in wheel chairs, kids with feeding tubes, kids on ventilators, kids with diabetes, kids who needed computers, kids with all kinds of expensive, hard to figure out needs would be in school and have a legal right to the help and support they needed. And the hope was that they would do better, live better, even learn, that some would become more independent, cost less later and even make society better. Some would just do better, and that would be better too. 

Taking care of children with special needs is not only morally right, and preferable to most people than euthanasia and abortion, it is pragmatic. Children like mine, who cannot speak, may learn to use a computer. Sure, assistive technology is expensive. My kid's computer (a My Tobii) cost $15,000! But, she will never play sports, never sing in the choir, never play an instrument, never take driver's education, never hold a pencil or a paint brush, never go to the prom. (Maybe the prom, maybe!) But the computer!? On her computer my second grader is doing math, and reading, and writing for the first time! We don't know yet how much she can do, but no one knew she could read, or add, or even think.  She might be able to earn a living  or some of her living, someday. That means the money we invest in special education now means that our typical kids might not have to pay so much for so long to keep kids like my daughter once we are dead. And even if she doesn't to leave a whole human being who can read and think trapped in her body for forty years? 

Well, you decide. What would you do? What will you do? We have to decide what kind of society we want to build. Will we fund IDEA or not? If we won't fund it, we should just be honest and go back to the way it was. 

The alternative to IDEA is history: institutions, boarding schools, orphanages and doctors who used to tell parents to give up this child, forget you had her. Personally, I am proud of this vision. I can't go so far as to say my daughter's disability is a gift from a higher power to her or me, but I agree with right, she is sacred. And the left, she should have rights. Maybe one day, we will be worthy of the vision of IDEA.

We have a spending problem. Let's fix it. Fund IDEA now. Special Education families could use the help of all families on this. Pass it on: we all have everything to gain. Pass it on: without your help to fix the funding problem, IDEA is really no IDEA at all. 

What will happen then?

I work every day for my girl. 

I joined the Community Advisory Committee on Special Education in our district.

Twice I have been to the state capitol. 

I meet with my legislator. 

I attend board meetings. 

I retained an attorney when our district refused to assess her need for a speech device. 

I applied for Medicare three times before she got it. 

Last month, a board of education member told me personally that the board was not going to cut special education. This month, huge cuts to special education are on the agenda. Our superintendent said the decision was basically already made. 

Either Gary Eberhart is a liar, or he is sadly uninformed as the board president. I actually think he is both intelligent and informed. Perhaps there is some other explanation. I hope so.

What scares me most is that these people who I work with every day, who have so little interest in my child and so much interest in their budget, will be the ones who "care" for her when I am gone. 

I hate to say that the worst thing I learned about her diagnosis is that she will most likely out live me. 

If most of the energy of most agencies now goes into finding reasons not to care for her, why should I think that will change after I die?

The true measure of a person is what they will do when they believe no one is looking. Based on what they do when people are obviously looking, I am scared for my girl. 

Fighting over scraps

Our local school board, as many will be, is considering deep cuts to special education. Parents of regular educations students are chaffing at the rights protected by law that disabled children have. They do not realize that these rights are protected because forty years ago, a child like mine would not be allowed in school at all. 

This is a copy of the open letter I wrote to our board. 

Special education is expensive, as you and caregivers of children with special needs know. However, it is lean, not wasteful. It is expensive locally because special education has already taken a forty percent cut from the federal government. It is not special education that encroaches on the general fund, it is the federal government that encroaches on education as a whole. Please do not continue to refer to our children or their programs as "encroachments". This blames them for a problem that they did not create and over which they have no control. It is inflammatory and insulting language that disguises the true problem. 

I would ask you to be careful as you lead this community. When resources are scarce, and leadership is willing to play on people's weaknesses and fears, people will protect their own at the expense of others. Very few people rescued disabled people during the holocaust. Even in our own New Orleans, gravely ill and disabled people in hospital were euthanized before they were rescued.  Every one is pro-life and pro-child in public, but the terrible truth is that most people wish my child were not here. The easier and more polite way to say this is to demand that she get less money, fewer services and be less of an "encroachment" on more able bodied, promising children. I know that it is easier to say this than to admit that few care if she lives or dies. 

If I had any wish, it would be that she were whole and healthy. I wish for a cure for Rett Syndrome. But there is none now, and we play the hand we are dealt. So instead, I wish for speech generating devices, a nurse who is on campus when she does have a seizure, a teacher who can inspire her to learn, and do her best, even in her daily pain. I wish for friends on campus who know her name, and invite her to play. For the simple joy of being a child in a community that embraces her and does not blame her for the burden that her disability is. 

Thank you for making some of our smaller wishes for her come true. As small as they are, they may be the only ones she ever gets. That our community sacrifices for her and others like her is to our honor; society is judged by how it cares for its weakest and most vulnerable members. 

I hope that you care-- and that you choose wisely. We are not yet on a rooftop in New Orleans. The levies have not yet broken. I do not have to choose between my children, or between yours and mine. 

Warmest Regards, 

Gina Hale, mother to Emma, age 8

school boards' face the impossible

I attended our local school board meeting last night to hear the latest in heartbreaking discussions of what to cut from the budget. This has been a resounding theme in our district, and many others for several years. Of course, we live in California, a state which, with the 7th largest economy in the world has the worst budgeting process in the world as far as I can tell. Still with our schools in 47th out of 50th in funding, we are still trying hard to reach 51 (allowing Puerto Rico to pass us). 

And our courageous Republican minority is still holding the budget hostage (we have a super majority rule here, so that two thirds of the state legislature has to pass the budget) insisting that they will not, not, not raise taxes. It might, they insist, hurt the economy. 

And it is not just the Republican minority in the state legislature. Parcel taxes in our district have failed the last three times we attempted to campaign. People were buying new SUVs and Wii's and wide screen digital TVs and voting down parcel taxes. I guess all that spending was good for the economies of the companies manufacturing these goods-- like Sony, Toyota and GMC. At least American car companies benefitted from all our spending right? And it provided good jobs, with full minimum wage jobs and no benefits or security for retail workers at good retail outlets. 

But I am confused. 

Our govenor lowered taxes, as promised in his campaign to recall the previous govenor, and the economy does not really seem to have gotten better in the last couple years...

Hmmm. So i want to try and think this through. Cut the budget further and what are the results? More people lose their jobs and can't make their mortgages. More homes go into foreclosure. More banks struggle. There are no jobs right now, so more people need general assistance, medicaid and food stamps, (which are also being cut, in order I guess to stimulate the economy) Shelters and food banks are already overwhelmed so I guess those newly homeless people will just have to live under the bridges, which actually are kind of crowded right now...

so how does all this budget cutting help,  exactly?  Any one?

We have already had, for years, kids going around the neighborhood, standing in lines at the grocery store and at the transit stations begging for donations or selling candy and gum to support music, art, sports, and yes, inconceivably even science programs for school. Every time I see them, I am ashamed. I am ashamed of my community, my state and my country. We should be taking care of this, not them. Why are our children forced to walk the streets begging for money for their schools? That seems fiscally irresponsible. Or some kind of irresponsible. 

I am proud to pay my taxes. I would pay more. The amount of money we pay in property taxes would not even cover tuition for one of my children in private school, much less three. And that tax money is supposed to cover a lot of other things, like 911 services, road building, medical and dental insurance for children...

In the Monty Python lampoon the The Life of Brian, they lampooned the anti-government stance. "What have the Romans ever done for us?" asks one of the revolutionaries of Judea. The others chime in, "Well, aqueducts." The first guy pauses, and says, "Well, besides aqueducts!?" After some arguing back and forth the list comes to include most of civilization: aqueducts, schools, sewers, health care, roads, trade... and so on. And after the long list, the first guy finally says, "Yeah, but besides all that?"

So besides dams and aqueducts, navigable harbors and water ways, vector control, health care for children, the elderly and disabled, k-12 schools community colleges and universities, roads, bridges, street lights, public utilities management, pollution regulation, public safety, fire fighters, ambulances, trauma centers, parks and recreation services, water treatment and sewage, farmers markets, street sweeping... what the heck are we getting for our tax dollars? Yeah, but besides that...

I am proud to pay my taxes and do my bit. I wish to never see another homeless family, another homeless veteran, another mentally ill person soiled and sitting in a doorway, another child with bad teeth or another student begging for money for her school. It would be worth not getting my kids an X-Box for that. Maybe they would even get some exercise and read without one. I wonder what others would give up.  And get. If we did. 

Fund the schools. Some day this generation of kids will grow up. And I don't think they will forget what we did when it was our turn to be responsible for them.